 |
Issues
The
Wik Decision
On the 30 June 1993 (before the Native Title Act became law), the
Wik peoples made a claim for native title in the Federal Court to
land on Cape York Peninsula in Queensland. The claim was joined
by the adjoining Thayorre People, with the joint claim covering
land including two pastoral leases granted by the Queensland Government.
The Wik peoples and the Thayorre people argued that native title
co-existed with the pastoral leases.
On 9 January 1996, the Federal Court decided that the claim could
not succeed over the areas as they were subject to pastoral leases.
The Court considered the grant of these leases under Queensland
law extinguished any native title rights. The Wik people went to
the High Court to appeal that decsision, with the judgment granted
on 23 December 1996 finding that:
- Native title
can only be extinguished by a written law or an act of the Government
which shows a clear and plain intention to extinguish native title.
- The statute
creating pastoral leases in Queensland did not show such an intention.
- Pastoral
leases in Queenland did not show such an intention.
- The leases
were created to meet the special needs of the Australian pastoral
industry.
- Pastoral
leases did not give exclusive possession to the pastoralists.
- The grant
of a pastoral lease does not necessarily extinguish native title
rights.
- Native title
rights could continue at the same time the land was subject to
a pastoral lease, with native title rights subordinate in cases
of conflict.
Click here for further information on the Wik decision.
[ TOP ] |
 |